Leture 16
We now have the tools to properly define the exponential and the logarithm that you know so well. We start with exponentiation.
If $n$ is a positive integer, we define \begin{equation*} x^n := \underbrace{x \cdot x \cdot \cdots \cdot x}_{n \text{ times}} . \end{equation*}
We also define $x^0:=1$. For negative integers,
$x^{-n} := \dfrac{1}{x^n}.$
If $x > 0,$ define
$x^{1/n}$ as
the unique positive $n$th root.
Finally, for a rational
number $\dfrac{n}{m}$ (in lowest terms),
define
$ x^{n/m} := {\bigl(x^{1/m}\bigr)}^n . $
Now, what do we mean by $\sqrt{3}^{\sqrt{5}}$? 🤔
Or $x^y$ in general?
In particular, what is $e^x$ for all $x$? And how do we solve $y=e^x$ for $x$?
Here we are going to answer these questions.
Theorem 8.3.1. There exists a unique function $L \colon (0,\infty) \to \R$ such that
Proof. To show the existence, we define a good candidate and show it satisfies all the properties. For example, let \begin{equation*} L(x) := \int_1^x \frac{1}{t}~dt . \end{equation*} Using this function, we can easily see that (1) holds,
since $\;L(1)$ $=\ds \int_1^1\frac{1}{t} ~dt$ $=0.$
Proof. Now, notice that property (2) holds by the second form of the fundamental theorem of calculus.
The function $f(t)= \dfrac{1}{t}$ is continuous on $(0,\infty)$, then $L$ is differentiable and \[ L'(x) = \frac{1}{x}. \]
This also implies that $L$ is continous.
Proof. To prove property (3), we just apply a change of variables $u=yt$ to obtain
$L(x) = \displaystyle \int_1^{x} \frac{1}{t}~dt$ $= \displaystyle \int_y^{xy} \frac{1}{u}~du $
$\qquad = \displaystyle \int_1^{xy} \frac{1}{u}~du - \int_1^{y} \frac{1}{u}~du $
$\displaystyle= L(xy)-L(y) . $
Proof. Finally we will prove that is unique using properties (1) and (2). Using the first form of the fundamental theorem of calculus, \begin{equation*} L(x) = \int_1^x \frac{1}{t}~dt \end{equation*} is the unique function such that
$\ds L(1) = 0 \,\;\text{ and }\,\; \ds L'(x) = \frac{1}{x}.$ $\; \bs$
$L \colon (0,\infty) \to \R$
More properties of $L \colon (0,\infty) \to \R$
Now that we proved
that there is a unique function with these properties,
we simply define the
Theorem 8.4.1. There exists a unique function $E \colon \R \to (0,\infty)$ such that
Proof. As we did before for $\ln x$, we prove existence of such a function by defining a candidate and proving that it satisfies all the properties.
The $L(x) = \ln (x)$ defined previously is invertible. Let $E$ be the inverse function of $L$. Property (1) is immediate.
Property (2) follows via the inverse function theorem. The function $L$ satisfies all the hypotheses of this theorem, and hence
$ E'(x) $ $= \dfrac{1}{L'\bigl(E(x)\bigr)} $ $= E(x) . $
Proof.
To prove property (3),
we use the corresponding
property for the logarithm.
Take $x, y \in \R$.
As $L$ is bijective, find $a$ and $b$ such that $x = L(a)$ and $y = L(b)$.
Then
$ E(x+y) $ $ = E\bigl(L(a)+L(b)\bigr) $ $ = E\bigl(L(ab)\bigr) $
$ = ab $ $ = E(x)E(y) .\quad \,\; $
Proof. Uniqueness follows from (1) and (2). Let $E$ and $F$ be two functions satisfying (1) and (2),
$ \displaystyle\frac{d}{dx} \Bigl( F(x)E(-x) \Bigr) = F'(x)E(-x) - E'(-x)F(x) $ $ \qquad\qquad\qquad = F(x)E(-x) - E(-x)F(x) $
$ =0 .\qquad\;\, $
This means that $F(x)E(-x)$ is constant by Theorem 6.3.1.
Thus $F(x)E(-x) $ $= F(0)E(-0) $ $ = 1$ for all $x \in \R$.
Proof. Thus $F(x)E(-x) $ $ = 1$ for all $x \in \R$. Next,
$1 = E(0)$ $= E(x-x) $ $ =E(x) E(-x)$.
Then
$ 0 = 1-1 $ $ =F(x)E(-x) - E(x)E(-x) $
$ \qquad \;\;= \bigl(F(x)-E(x)\bigr) E(-x) . $
Finally, $E(-x) \not= 0$ for all $x \in \R$. So $F(x)-E(x) = 0$ for all $x$, and this completes the proof. $\blacksquare$
$E \colon \R \to (0,\infty) $
More properties of $E \colon \R \to (0,\infty) $
Now we can define the
If $y \in \Q$ and $x > 0$, then \begin{equation*} x^y = \exp\bigl(\ln(x^y)\bigr) = \exp\bigl(y\ln(x)\bigr) . \end{equation*}
We can now make sense of exponentiation $x^y$ for arbitrary $y \in \R$; if $x > 0$ and $y$ is irrational, define \begin{equation*} x^y := \exp\bigl(y\ln(x)\bigr) . \end{equation*}
Define the number $e$ as: \begin{equation*} e := \exp(1) . \end{equation*} This is known as Euler's number or the base of the natural logarithm.
The notation $e^x$ for $\exp(x)$: \begin{equation*} e^x = \exp\bigl(x \ln(e) \bigr) = \exp(x) . \end{equation*}
Theorem 8.4.2. Let $x, y \in \R$.
Imagine we are living in 1823 and we need to compute \[ x=\sqrt[3]{\frac{493.8\times \left(23.67\right)^2}{5.104}}. \]
😬 ❌🖥️
Why did you need to make such calculation?
🧭 🗺️ 🌌 🔭
Imagine we are living in 1823 and we need to compute $ \ds x=\sqrt[3]{\frac{493.8\times \left(23.67\right)^2}{5.104}}. $
Imagine we are living in 1823 and we need to compute $ \ds x=\sqrt[3]{\frac{493.8\times \left(23.67\right)^2}{5.104}}. $
We can write $\,\ds x=\left(\frac{493.8\times \left(23.67\right)^2}{5.104}\right)^{1/3}.$
Using the properties of the logarithms, we have
$ \ds \log x=\frac{1}{3}\bigg(\log (493.8)+2\log (23.67)-\log (5.104)\bigg). $
Then we find these values using the logarithmic tables 📖.
👉 $\;x\approx 37.84$
Imagine we are living in 1823 and we need to compute $ \ds x = \sqrt{\frac{493.8\times (23.67)^2}{5.104}} $
👉 $\;x\approx 37.84$
Logarithms exists thanks to John Napier and Jost Bürgi who discovered independently at the beginning of the XVII century.
But they did not know about the relationship between the exponential function ($e^x$ where $e$ is the Euler's constant) and the natural logarithmic function ($\ln x$, i.e., logartihm with base $e$).
This relationship was discovered later (circa 1647) by Grégoire de Saint-Vincent who was trying to compute the area under the square parabola $1/x.$
This relationship was discovered later (circa 1647) by Grégoire de Saint-Vincent who was trying to compute the area under the square parabola $1/x.$
Area under $1/x$ $ = \ds\int_1^x \dfrac{1}{t}dt$ $ = \ln x.$
How cool is that? 😃
References
Since nothing is more tedious, fellow mathematicians, in the practice of the mathematical arts, than the great delays suffered in the tedium of lengthy multiplications and divisions, the finding of ratios, and in the extraction of square and cube roots- and in which not only is there the time delay to be considered, but also the annoyance of the many slippery errors that can arise.
John Napier (1614)